Publications

Displaying 61 - 80 of 100
By year of publication, then alphabetical by title
  1. Kumarathunge, Dushan P., et al. “No Evidence for Triose Phosphate Limitation of light‐saturated Leaf Photosynthesis under Current Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentration”. Plant, Cell & Environment, vol. 42, no. 12, 2019, pp. 3241-52, https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13639.
  2. Garayshin, V.V., et al. “Numerical Modeling of Two-Dimensional Temperature Field Dynamics across Non-Deforming Ice-Wedge Polygons”. Cold Regions Science and Technology, vol. 161, 2019, pp. 115-28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.12.004.
  3. Vaughn, Lydia J. S. “Radiocarbon Evidence That Millennial and Fast-Cycling Soil Carbon Are Equally Sensitive to Warming”. Nature Climate Change, vol. 9, no. 6, 2019, pp. 467-71, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0468-y.
  4. Gu, Xueying, et al. “Saturated Nitrous Oxide Emission Rates Occur above the Nitrogen Deposition Level Predicted for the Semi-Arid Grasslands of Inner Mongolia, China”. Geoderma, vol. 341, 2019, pp. 18-25, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.01.002.
  5. Muster, Sina, et al. “Size Distributions of Arctic Waterbodies Reveal Consistent Relations in Their Statistical Moments in Space and Time”. Frontiers in Earth Science, vol. 7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00005.
  6. Yang, Ziming, et al. “Temperature Sensitivity of Mineral-Enzyme Interactions on the Hydrolysis of Cellobiose and Indican by Beta-Glucosidase”. Science of The Total Environment, vol. 686, 2019, pp. 1194-01, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.479.
  7. Rogers, Alistair, et al. “Terrestrial Biosphere Models May Overestimate Arctic Carbon Dioxide Assimilation If They Do Not Account for Decreased Quantum Yield and Convexity at Low Temperature”. New Phytologist, vol. 223, no. 223, 2019, pp. 167-79, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15750.
  8. Burnett, Angela C., et al. “The ‘one‐point method’ for Estimating Maximum Carboxylation Capacity of Photosynthesis: A Cautionary Tale”. Plant, Cell & Environment, vol. 42, no. 8, 2019, pp. 2472-81, https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13574.
  9. Thomas, H. J. D., et al. “Traditional Plant Functional Groups Explain Variation in Economic But Not size‐related Traits across the Tundra Biome”. Global Ecology and Biogeography, vol. 28, no. 2, 2019, pp. 78-95, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12783.
  10. Reuss-Schmidt, Kassandra, et al. “Understanding Spatial Variability of Methane Fluxes in Arctic Wetlands through Footprint Modelling”. Environmental Research Letters, vol. 14, no. 12, 2019, p. 125010, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab4d32.
  11. Bennett, Katrina E., et al. “Using MODIS Estimates of Fractional Snow Cover Area to Improve Streamflow Forecasts in Interior Alaska”. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 23, no. 5, 2019, pp. 2439-5, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2439-2019.
  12. Overeem, Irina, et al. “A Modeling Toolbox for Permafrost Landscapes”. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, vol. 99, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EO105155.
  13. Jan, Ahmad, et al. “A Subgrid Approach for Modeling Microtopography Effects on Overland Flow”. Water Resources Research, vol. 54, no. 9, 2018, pp. 6153-67, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR021898.
  14. Wang, Kang, et al. “A Synthesis Dataset of Permafrost-Affected Soil Thermal Conditions for Alaska, USA”. Earth System Science Data, vol. 10, no. 4, 2018, pp. 2311-28, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-2311-2018.
  15. Mekonnen, Zelalem A., et al. “Accelerated Nutrient Cycling and Increased Light Competition Will Lead to 21st Century Shrub Expansion in North American Arctic Tundra”. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, vol. 123, no. 5, 2018, pp. 1683-01, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JG004319.
  16. Jan, Ahmad, et al. “An Intermediate-Scale Model for Thermal Hydrology in Low-Relief Permafrost-Affected Landscapes”. Computational Geosciences, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-017-9679-3.
  17. Jubb, Aaron M., et al. “Characterization of Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Films at the air–water Interface in Arctic Tundra Waters”. Science of The Total Environment, vol. 633, 2018, pp. 1460-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.332.
  18. McGuire, David, et al. “Dependence of the Evolution of Carbon Dynamics in the Northern Permafrost Region on the Trajectory of Climate Change”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115, no. 15, 2018, pp. 3882-7, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719903115.
  19. Wu, Yuxin, et al. “Depth-Resolved Physicochemical Characteristics of Active Layer and Permafrost Soils in an Arctic Polygonal Tundra Region”. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, vol. 123, no. 4, 2018, pp. 1366-8, https://doi.org/10.1002/2018JG004413.
  20. Parazoo, Nicholas C., et al. “Detecting the Permafrost Carbon Feedback: Talik Formation and Increased Cold-Seasonrespiration As Precursors to Sink-to-Source Transitions”. The Cryosphere Discussions, 2018, pp. 1-44, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2017-18910.5194/tc-2017-189-RC110.5194/tc-2017-189-RC210.5194/tc-2017-189-AC110.5194/tc-2017-189-AC2.