Publications

Displaying 21 - 40 of 76
By year of publication, then alphabetical by title
  1. Jan, Ahmad, and Scott L. Painter. “Permafrost Thermal Conditions Are Sensitive to Shifts in Snow Timing”. Environmental Research Letters, vol. 15, no. 8, 2020, p. 084026, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8ec4.
  2. Lehmann, Johannes, et al. “Persistence of Soil Organic Carbon Caused by Functional Complexity”. Nature Geoscience, vol. 13, no. 8, 2020, pp. 529-34, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0612-3.
  3. Schaefer, Kevin M., et al. “Potential Impacts of Mercury Released from Thawing Permafrost”. Nature Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18398-5.
  4. Wang, Kang, et al. “Sensitivity Evaluation of the Kudryavtsev Permafrost Model”. Science of The Total Environment, vol. 720, 2020, p. 137538, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137538.
  5. Andresen, Christian G., et al. “Soil Moisture and Hydrology Projections of the Permafrost Region – a Model Intercomparison”. The Cryosphere, vol. 14, no. 2, 2020, pp. 445-59, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-445-2020.
  6. Bergmann, Joana, et al. “The Fungal Collaboration Gradient Dominates the Root Economics Space in Plants”. Science Advances, vol. 6, no. 27, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba3756.
  7. Andersen, Jeremiah K., et al. “The State of the Climate in 2019: The Arctic”. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 101, no. 8, 2020, pp. S239 - S286, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0086.1.
  8. Conroy, Nathan Alec, et al. “Timing and Duration of Hydrological Transitions in Arctic Polygonal Ground from Stable Isotopes”. Hydrological Processes, vol. 34, 2020, pp. 749-64, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13623.
  9. Conroy, Nathan Alec, et al. “Timing and Duration of Hydrological Transitions in Arctic Polygonal Ground from Stable Isotopes”. Hydrological Processes, vol. 34, no. 3, 2020, pp. 749-64, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13623.
  10. Kattge, Jens, et al. “TRY Plant Trait Database – Enhanced Coverage and Open Access”. Global Change Biology, vol. 26, 2020, pp. 119-88, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14904.
  11. Collins, A. D., et al. “UAS LIDAR MAPPING OF AN ARCTIC TUNDRA WATERSHED: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES”. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XLIV-M-2-2020, 2020, pp. 1-8, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xliv-m-2-2020-1-2020.
  12. Wales, Nathan A., et al. “Understanding the Relative Importance of Vertical and Horizontal Flow in Ice-Wedge Polygons”. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 24, no. 3, 2020, pp. 1109-2, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1109-2020.
  13. Ali, Ashehad A., et al. “A Global Scale Mechanistic Model of Photosynthetic Capacity (LUNA V1.0)”. Geoscientific Model Development, vol. 9, no. 2, 2016, pp. 587-06, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-587-201610.5194/gmd-9-587-2016-supplement.
  14. Liu, Yaning, et al. “A Hybrid Reduced-Order Model of Fine-Resolution Hydrologic Simulations at a Polygonal Tundra Site”. Vadose Zone Journal, vol. 15, no. 2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2015.05.0068.
  15. Xu, Xiyan, et al. “A Multi-Scale Comparison of Modeled and Observed Seasonal Methane Emissions in Northern Wetlands”. Biogeosciences, vol. 13, no. 17, 2016, pp. 5043-56, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-5043-201610.5194/bg-13-5043-2016-supplement.
  16. Dou, Shan, et al. “A Rock-Physics Investigation of Unconsolidated Saline Permafrost: P-Wave Properties from Laboratory Ultrasonic Measurements”. GEOPHYSICS, vol. 81, no. 1, 2016, pp. WA233 - WA245, https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0176.1.
  17. De Kauwe, Martin G., et al. “A Test of the ‘one-Point method’ for Estimating Maximum Carboxylation Capacity from Field-Measured, Light-Saturated Photosynthesis”. New Phytologist, no. 3, 2016, pp. 1130-44, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13815.
  18. Throckmorton, Heather M., et al. “Active Layer Hydrology in an Arctic Tundra Ecosystem: Quantifying Water Sources and Cycling Using Water Stable Isotopes”. Hydrological Processes, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10883.
  19. Tang, Guoping, et al. “Addressing Numerical Challenges in Introducing a Reactive Transport Code into a Land Surface Model: A Biogeochemical Modeling Proof-of-Concept With CLM–PFLOTRAN 1.0”. Geoscientific Model Development, vol. 9, no. 3, 2016, pp. 927-46, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-927-2016.
  20. Tang, Guoping, et al. “Biogeochemical Model of Carbon Dioxide and Methane Production in Anoxic Arctic Soil Microcosms”. Biogeosciences Discussions, 2016, pp. 1-31, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2016-20710.5194/bg-2016-207-supplement10.5194/bg-2016-207-RC110.5194/bg-2016-207-RC210.5194/bg-2016-207-RC310.5194/bg-2016-207-AC110.5194/bg-2016-207-AC2.