Vladimir Romanovsky

First name
Vladimir
Last name
Romanovsky

2022

  • Farquharson, Louise M., et al. “Sub-Aerial Talik Formation Observed across the Discontinuous Permafrost Zone of Alaska”. Nature Geoscience, vol. 15, no. 6, 2022, pp. 475-81, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00952-z.

2021

  • Mekonnen, Zelalem A., et al. “Changes in Precipitation and Air Temperature Contribute Comparably to Permafrost Degradation in a Warmer Climate”. Environmental Research Letters, vol. 16, no. 2, 2021, p. 024008, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc444.
  • Schneider von Deimling, Thomas, et al. “Consequences of Permafrost Degradation for Arctic Infrastructure – Bridging the Model Gap Between Regional and Engineering Scales”. The Cryosphere, vol. 15, no. 5, 2021, pp. 2451-7, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2451-2021.
  • Debolskiy, Matvey V., et al. “Water Balance Response of Permafrost-Affected Watersheds to Changes in Air Temperatures”. Environmental Research Letters, vol. 16, no. 8, 2021, p. 084054, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac12f3.

2020

  • Euskirchen, Eugénie S., et al. “Co‐producing Knowledge: The Integrated Ecosystem Model for Resource Management in Arctic Alaska”. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, vol. 18, no. 1, 2020, pp. 447-55, https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2176.
  • Debolskiy, Matvey V., et al. “Modeling Present and Future Permafrost Distribution at the Seward Peninsula, Alaska”. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, vol. 125, no. 8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005355.
  • Andersen, Jeremiah K., et al. “The State of the Climate in 2019: The Arctic”. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 101, no. 8, 2020, pp. S239 - S286, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0086.1.

2019

  • Léger, Emmanuel, et al. “A Distributed Temperature Profiling Method for Assessing Spatial Variability in Ground Temperatures in a Discontinuous Permafrost Region of Alaska”. The Cryosphere, vol. 13, 2019, pp. 2853-67, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2853-2019.
  • Garayshin, V.V., et al. “Numerical Modeling of Two-Dimensional Temperature Field Dynamics across Non-Deforming Ice-Wedge Polygons”. Cold Regions Science and Technology, vol. 161, 2019, pp. 115-28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.12.004.

2018

  • Wang, Kang, et al. “A Synthesis Dataset of Permafrost-Affected Soil Thermal Conditions for Alaska, USA”. Earth System Science Data, vol. 10, no. 4, 2018, pp. 2311-28, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-2311-2018.
  • Parazoo, Nicholas C., et al. “Detecting the Permafrost Carbon Feedback: Talik Formation and Increased Cold-Seasonrespiration As Precursors to Sink-to-Source Transitions”. The Cryosphere Discussions, 2018, pp. 1-44, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2017-18910.5194/tc-2017-189-RC110.5194/tc-2017-189-RC210.5194/tc-2017-189-AC110.5194/tc-2017-189-AC2.
  • Bisht, Gautam, et al. “Impacts of Microtopographic Snow Redistribution and Lateral Subsurface Processes on Hydrologic and Thermal States in an Arctic Polygonal Ground Ecosystem: A Case Study Using ELM-3D v1.0”. Geoscientific Model Development, vol. 11, no. 1, 2018, pp. 61-76, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-61-2018.
  • Nicolsky, Dmitry J., and Vladimir E. Romanovsky. “Modeling Long-Term Permafrost Degradation”. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, vol. 123, no. 8, 2018, pp. 1756-71, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JF004655.
  • Jafarov, Elchin E., et al. “Modeling the Role of Preferential Snow Accumulation in through Talik Development and Hillslope Groundwater Flow in a Transitional Permafrost Landscape”. Environmental Research Letters, vol. 13, no. 10, 2018, p. 105006, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aadd30.

2017

  • Nicolsky, Dmitry J., et al. “Applicability of the Ecosystem Type Approach to Model Permafrost Dynamics across the Alaska North Slope”. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, vol. 122, no. 1, 2017, pp. 50-75, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JF003852.
  • Dafflon, Baptiste, et al. “Coincident Aboveground and Belowground Autonomous Monitoring to Quantify Covariability in Permafrost, Soil, and Vegetation Properties in Arctic Tundra”. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, vol. 122, no. 6, 2017, pp. 1321-42, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003724.
  • Wang, Kang, et al. “Continuously Amplified Warming in the Alaskan Arctic: Implications for Estimating Global Warming Hiatus”. Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 44, no. 17, 2017, pp. 9029-38, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074232.
  • Strauss, Jens, et al. “Deep Yedoma Permafrost: A Synthesis of Depositional Characteristics and Carbon Vulnerability”. Earth-Science Reviews, vol. 172, 2017, pp. 75-86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.07.007.
  • Raz-Yaseef, Naama, et al. “Large Carbon Dioxide and Methane Emissions from Polygonal Tundra During Spring Thaw in Northern Alaska”. Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 44, no. 1, 2017, pp. 504-13, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071220.

2016

  • Olefeldt, David, et al. “Circumpolar Distribution and Carbon Storage of Thermokarst Landscapes”. Nature Communications, vol. 7, 2016, p. 13043, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13043.
  • Harp, Dylan R., et al. “Effect of Soil Property Uncertainties on Permafrost Thaw Projections: A Calibration-Constrained Analysis”. The Cryosphere, vol. 10, no. 1, 2016, pp. 341-58, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-341-201610.5194/tc-10-341-2016-supplement.
  • Kumar, Jitendra, et al. “Modeling the Spatiotemporal Variability in Subsurface Thermal Regimes across a Low-Relief Polygonal Tundra Landscape”. The Cryosphere, vol. 10, no. 5, 2016, pp. 2241-74, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2241-2016.
  • Liljedahl, Anna K., et al. “Pan-Arctic Ice-Wedge Degradation in Warming Permafrost and Its Influence on Tundra Hydrology”. Nature Geoscience, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2674.
  • Cable, William L., et al. “Scaling-up Permafrost Thermal Measurements in Western Alaska Using an Ecotype Approach”. The Cryosphere, vol. 10, no. 5, 2016, pp. 2517-32, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2517-2016.
  • Farquharson, Louise M., et al. “Spatial Distribution of Thermokarst Terrain in Arctic Alaska”. Geomorphology, vol. 273, 2016, pp. 116-33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.08.007.

2015

  • Koven, Charles D., et al. “A Simplified, Data-Constrained Approach to Estimate the Permafrost carbon–climate Feedback”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 373, no. 2054, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0423.
  • Muskett, Reginald R., et al. “Active-Layer Soil Moisture Content Regional Variations in Alaska and Russia by Ground-Based and Satellite-Based Methods, 2002 through 2014”. International Journal of Geosciences, vol. 06, no. 01, 2015, pp. 12-41, https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2015.61002.
  • Schuur, Edward A.G., et al. “Climate Change and the Permafrost Carbon Feedback”. Nature, vol. 520, no. 7546, 2015, pp. 171-9, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14338.
  • Heikoop, Jeffrey Martin, et al. “Isotopic Identification of Soil and Permafrost Nitrate Sources in an Arctic Tundra Ecosystem”. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, vol. 120, no. 6, 2015, pp. 1000-17, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JG002883.
  • Atchley, Adam L., et al. “Using Field Observations to Inform Thermal Hydrology Models of Permafrost Dynamics With ATS (v0.83)”. Geoscientific Model Development, vol. 8, no. 9, 2015, pp. 2701-22, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2701-2015.

2010

  • Rowland, Joel C., et al. “Arctic Landscapes in Transition: Responses to Thawing Permafrost”. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, vol. 91, no. 26, 2010, p. 229, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010EO260001.