Publications

Displaying 21 - 36 of 36
By year of publication, then alphabetical by title
  1. Yuan, Fengming, and Shuhua Yi. “Responses of Boreal Forest Ecosystems and Permafrost to Climate Change and Disturbances: A Modeling Perspective”. Arctic Hydrology, Permafrost and Ecosystems, Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 849-92, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50930-9_29.
  2. Kropp, Heather, et al. “Shallow Soils Are Warmer under Trees and Tall Shrubs across Arctic and Boreal Ecosystems”. Environmental Research Letters, vol. 16, no. 1, 2021, p. 015001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc994.
  3. Watts, Jennifer D., et al. “Soil Respiration Strongly Offsets Carbon Uptake in Alaska and Northwest Canada”. Environmental Research Letters, vol. 16, no. 8, 2021, p. 084051, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1222.
  4. Virkkala, Anna-Maria, et al. “Statistical Upscaling of Ecosystem Carbon Dioxide Fluxes across the Terrestrial Tundra and Boreal Domain: Regional Patterns and Uncertainties”. Global Change Biology, vol. 27, no. 17, 2021, pp. 4040-59, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.v27.1710.1111/gcb.15659.
  5. Roy_Chowdhury, Taniya, et al. “Temporal, Spatial, and Temperature Controls on Organic Carbon Mineralization and Methanogenesis in Arctic High-Centered Polygon SoilsData_Sheet_1.Docx”. Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.61651810.3389/fmicb.2020.616518.s001.
  6. Mekonnen, Zelalem A., et al. “Topographical Controls on Hillslope‐Scale Hydrology Drive Shrub Distributions on the Seward Peninsula, Alaska”. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, vol. 126, no. 2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005823.
  7. Rogers, Alistair, et al. “Triose Phosphate Utilization Limitation: An Unnecessary Complexity in Terrestrial Biosphere Model Representation of Photosynthesis”. New Phytologist, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17092.
  8. Ladd, Mallory P., et al. “Untargeted Exometabolomics Provides a Powerful Approach to Investigate Biogeochemical Hotspots With Vegetation and Polygon Type in Arctic Tundra Soils”. Soil Systems, vol. 5, no. 1, 2021, p. 10, https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems5010010.
  9. Debolskiy, Matvey V., et al. “Water Balance Response of Permafrost-Affected Watersheds to Changes in Air Temperatures”. Environmental Research Letters, vol. 16, no. 8, 2021, p. 084054, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac12f3.
  10. McGuire, David, et al. “An Assessment of the Carbon Balance of Arctic Tundra: Comparisons Among Observations, Process Models, and Atmospheric Inversions”. Biogeosciences, vol. 9, no. 8, 2012, pp. 3185-04, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3185-201210.5194/bg-9-3185-2012-supplement.
  11. Lewis, K. C., et al. “Drainage Subsidence Associated With Arctic Permafrost Degradation”. Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 117, no. F4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002284.
  12. Lee, Hanna, et al. “Enhancing Terrestrial Ecosystem Sciences by Integrating Empirical Modeling Approaches”. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, vol. 93, no. 25, 2012, pp. 237-, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012EO250008.
  13. McCarthy, Heather R., et al. “Integrating Empirical-Modeling Approaches to Improve Understanding of Terrestrial Ecology Processes”. New Phytologist, vol. 195, no. 3, 2012, pp. 523-5, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04222.x.
  14. Graham, David E., et al. “Microbes in Thawing Permafrost: The Unknown Variable in the Climate Change Equation”. The ISME Journal, vol. 6, no. 4, 2012, pp. 709-12, https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.163.
  15. Xu, Chonggang, et al. “Toward a Mechanistic Modeling of Nitrogen Limitation on Vegetation Dynamics”. PLOS ONE, vol. 7, no. 5, 2012, p. e37914, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037914.
  16. Bouskill, Nicholas J., et al. “Trait-Based Representation of Biological Nitrification: Model Development, Testing, and Predicted Community Composition”. Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00364.